Mitchell V. Lublin McGaughy Associates Opinion Of The Court: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

27 April 2024

26 April 2024

  • curprev 22:1622:16, 26 April 2024‎ BrittanySellwood talk contribs‎ 5,595 bytes +5,595‎ Created page with "<br>Petitioner, the Secretary of Labor, brought this action under § 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 217, 29 U.S.C.A. Act. 29 U.S.C. §§ 206, 207, 211, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 206, 207, 211. The complaint was dismissed basically on the lower court's conclusion that the activities of respondent, an architectural and consulting engineering firm, were local in nature and not within the Act's coverage. 250 F.2d 253. We granted certiorari 356 U.S. 917, 78 S.Ct. 704..."
Retrieved from "https://brongersma.stanford.edu/plasmonmuri/index.php?title=Mitchell_V._Lublin_McGaughy_Associates_Opinion_Of_The_Court"